Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 207
Filtrar
1.
PLoS Med ; 17(11): e1003434, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective health system interventions may help address the disproportionate burden of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We assessed the impact of health system interventions to improve outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes in LMICs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, African Index Medicus, LILACS, and Global Index Medicus from inception of each database through February 24, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of health system interventions targeting adults with type 2 diabetes in LMICs. Eligible studies reported at least 1 of the following outcomes: glycemic change, mortality, quality of life, or cost-effectiveness. We conducted a meta-analysis for the glycemic outcome of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). GRADE and Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care methods were used to assess risk of bias for the glycemic outcome and to prepare a summary of findings table. Of the 12,921 references identified in searches, we included 39 studies in the narrative review of which 19 were cluster RCTs and 20 were individual RCTs. The greatest number of studies were conducted in the East Asia and Pacific region (n = 20) followed by South Asia (n = 7). There were 21,080 total participants enrolled across included studies and 10,060 total participants in the meta-analysis of HbA1c when accounting for the design effect of cluster RCTs. Non-glycemic outcomes of mortality, health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness had sparse data availability that precluded quantitative pooling. In the meta-analysis of HbA1c from 35 of the included studies, the mean difference was -0.46% (95% CI -0.60% to -0.31%, I2 87.8%, p < 0.001) overall, -0.37% (95% CI -0.64% to -0.10%, I2 60.0%, n = 7, p = 0.020) in multicomponent clinic-based interventions, -0.87% (-1.20% to -0.53%, I2 91.0%, n = 13, p < 0.001) in pharmacist task-sharing studies, and -0.27% (-0.50% to -0.04%, I2 64.1%, n = 7, p = 0.010) in trials of diabetes education or support alone. Other types of interventions had few included studies. Eight studies were at low risk of bias for the summary assessment of glycemic control, 15 studies were at unclear risk, and 16 studies were at high risk. The certainty of evidence for glycemic control by subgroup was moderate for multicomponent clinic-based interventions but was low or very low for other intervention types. Limitations include the lack of consensus definitions for health system interventions, differences in the quality of underlying studies, and sparse data availability for non-glycemic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, we found that health system interventions for type 2 diabetes may be effective in improving glycemic control in LMICs, but few studies are available from rural areas or low- or lower-middle-income countries. Multicomponent clinic-based interventions had the strongest evidence for glycemic benefit among intervention types. Further research is needed to assess non-glycemic outcomes and to study implementation in rural and low-income settings.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Educación en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Asia , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Programas de Gobierno/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación en Salud/economía , Humanos , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida
2.
Transfusion ; 60(12): 2828-2833, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989778

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Arkansas is a rural state of 3 million people. It is ranked fifth for poverty nationally. The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Arkansas occurred on 11 March 2020. Since then, approximately 8% of all Arkansans have tested positive. Given the resource limitations of Arkansas, COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was explored as a potentially lifesaving, therapeutic option. Therefore, the Arkansas Initiative for Convalescent Plasma was developed to ensure that every Arkansan has access to this therapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD: This brief report describes the statewide collaborative response from hospitals, blood collectors, and the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH) to ensure that CCP was available in a resource-limited state. RESULTS: Early contact tracing by ADH identified individuals who had come into contact with "patient zero" in early March. Within the first week, 32 patients tested positive for COVID-19. The first set of CCP collections occurred on 9 April 2020. Donors had to be triaged carefully in the initial period, as many had recently resolved their symptoms. From our first collections, with appropriate resource and inventory management, we collected sufficient CCP to provide the requested number of units for every patient treated with CCP in Arkansas. CONCLUSIONS: The Arkansas Initiative, a statewide effort to ensure CCP for every patient in a resource-limited state, required careful coordination among key players. Collaboration and resource management was crucial to meet the demand of CCP products and potentially save lives.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Pandemias , Asignación de Recursos/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Arkansas/epidemiología , Bancos de Sangre/economía , Bancos de Sangre/organización & administración , Donantes de Sangre/provisión & distribución , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Trazado de Contacto , Convalecencia , Recursos en Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Colaboración Intersectorial , Pobreza , Asignación de Recursos/economía , Población Rural , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957556

RESUMEN

The economic evaluation of health system interventions is challenging, and methods guidance on how to respond to these challenges is lacking. The REACHOUT consortium developed and evaluated complex interventions for community health program quality improvement in six countries in Africa and Asia. Reflecting on the challenges we faced in conducting an economic evaluation alongside REACHOUT, we developed a Structured Economic Evaluation Process for Complex Health System Interventions (SEEP-CI). The SEEP-CI aims to establish the threshold effect size that would justify investment in a complex intervention, and provide an assessment to a decision-maker of how likely it is that the intervention can achieve this impact. We illustrate how the SEEP-CI could have been applied to REACHOUT to identify outcomes where the intervention might have impact and causal mechanisms, through which that impact might occur, guide data collection by focusing on proximal outcomes most likely to illustrate the effectiveness of the intervention, identify the size of health gain required to justify investment in the intervention, and indicate the assumptions required to accept that such health gains are credible. Further research is required to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the SEEP-CI, and the contexts in which it could be used.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Atención a la Salud , Programas de Gobierno , África , Asia , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud/economía
4.
Pharmacogenomics ; 21(11): 785-796, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748688

RESUMEN

Pharmacogenomics test coverage and reimbursement are major obstacles to clinical uptake. Several early adopter programs have been successfully initiated through dedicated investments by federal and institutional research funding. As a result of research endeavors, evidence has grown sufficiently to support development of pharmacogenomics guidelines. However, clinical uptake is still limited. Third-party payer support plays an important role in increasing adoption, which to date has been limited to reactive single-gene testing. Access to and interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing are driving demand for increasing healthcare providers and third-party awareness of this burgeoning field. Pharmacogenomics implementation models developed by early adopters promise to expand patient access and options, as testing continues to increase due to growing consumer interest and falling test prices.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/tendencias , Personal de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/educación , Personal de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/tendencias , Asistencia Médica/economía , Asistencia Médica/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/tendencias , Medicina de Precisión/economía , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias
5.
Healthc Pap ; 19(1): 11-18, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310749

RESUMEN

Integrated healthcare models are being experimented with in many jurisdictions as a way to improve patient care and lower system costs. This commentary presents early lessons from one Ontario Health Team as it works towards new models of care. The authors recount early discussions on developing an integrated health services network, how funding for "winter surge initiatives" became an opportunity to test ideas and how these experiences are informing current planning. Some of the early lessons learned include the value of trusted relationships, moving care upstream and framing problems as collective challenges.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Desarrollo de Programa , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Ontario
6.
Ann Fam Med ; 17(Suppl 1): S67-S72, 2019 08 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31405879

RESUMEN

Passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act triggered 2 successive grant initiatives from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, allowing for the evolution of health extension models among 20 states, not limited to support for in-clinic primary care practice transformation, but also including a broader concept incorporating technical assistance for practices and their communities to address social determinants of health. Five states stand out in stretching the boundaries of health extension: New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Colorado, and Washington. Their stories reveal lessons learned regarding the successes and challenges, including the importance of building sustained relationships with practices and community coalitions; of documenting success in broad terms as well as achieving diverse outcomes of meaning to different stakeholders; of understanding that health extension is a function that can be carried out by an individual or group depending on resources; and of being prepared for political struggles over "turf" and ownership of extension. All states saw the need for long-term, sustained fundraising beyond grants in an environment expecting a short-term return on investment, and they were challenged operating in a shifting health system landscape where the creativity and personal relationships built with small primary care practices was hindered when these practices were purchased by larger health delivery systems.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Planes Estatales de Salud/normas , Gestión de la Calidad Total/métodos , Colorado , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Humanos , New Mexico , Oklahoma , Oregon , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Estados Unidos , Washingtón
7.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30982791

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the performance of health systems (performance), the state of prefectures was investigated. METHODS: Using the method developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, we conducted the study using 27 indicators. To evaluate the performance, we examined the signal-to-noise ratio of transcription (η) by integrating indicators using the Mahalanobis-Taguchi method. The η was separated by a median. The ratio of prefectures in East or West Japan and the presence or absence of ordinance-designated cities were studied using the chi-square test. Furthermore, the correlation among the total component η (T-η), each component η, and expenditures, and the correlation between T-η and life expectancy, were studied. RESULTS: The T-η positively correlated with the risk factors (RF)-η and the resources (R)-η, and negatively correlated with the health status (HS)-η. The number pf prefectures without ordinance-designated cities where the T-η and RF-η exceeded the median was large. The number of prefectures with ordinance-designated cities where the HS-η exceeded the median was also large. In addition, there were many prefectures where the T-η was in the top 25% in West Japan. There were positive correlations between the total expenditures and the T-η, the expenditures and the RF-η, and the expenditures and the R-η. There was a negative correlation between the expenditures and the HS-η, and the T-η and the life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS: For life expectancy, prefectures with too good performance were recognized. In these prefectures, correction of resources is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Recursos en Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Japón , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Relación Señal-Ruido
8.
BMJ Open ; 9(2): e023376, 2019 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30826790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Social capital-the resources embedded in social relationships-has been associated with health severally. Notwithstanding, only a handful of studies have empirically examined how it shapes health policies. This paper extends the discourse by comparatively examining how variations in local patterns of structural and cognitive social capital underpin the successes and challenges in managing and sustaining the Community-Based Health Planning Services (CHPS) policy in Ghana. The CHPS is an intervention to address health inequalities. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving individual in-depth interviews and focus group discussions using a semi-structured interview guide. Thematic analysis approach, inspired by McConnell's typology of policy success (or failure) was adopted. SETTING: Two rural communities in two districts in Ashanti region in Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two primary participants as well as four health personnel and four traditional and political leaders. RESULTS: Both structural and cognitive components of social capital underpinned efficient functioning of the CHPS initiative regarding funding, patronage and effective information transmission. Sufficient level of social capital in a community enhanced understanding of the nature and purpose of the CHPS policy as well as complementary ones such as the referral policy. Contrary to popular conclusions, it was discovered that the influence of social capital was not necessarily embedded in its quantity but the extent of conscious activation and application. Furthermore, the findings contravened the assertion that social capital may be less potent in small-sized communities. However, elevated levels of cognitive social capital encouraged people to access the CHPS on credit or even for free, which was injurious to its sustenance. CONCLUSION: The CHPS initiative, and pro-poor policies alike, are more likely to thrive in localities with sufficient structural and cognitive social capital. Lack of it may render the CHPS susceptible to recurrent, yet preventable challenges.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Capital Social , Adulto , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Ghana , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Investigación Cualitativa , Adulto Joven
9.
Eval Program Plann ; 72: 170-178, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30368104

RESUMEN

While primary health care programmes based on community participation are widely implemented in low- and middle- income settings, empirical evidence on whether and to what extent local people have the capacity to participate, support and drive such programmes scale up is scant in these countries. This paper assessed the level of community capacity to participate in one such programme - the Community-Based Health Planning and Service (CHPS) in Ghana. The capacity assessments were drawn from Chaskin's (2001) theorised indicators of community capacity with modifications to include: sense of community; community members commitment; community leadership commitment; problem solving mechanisms; and access to resources. These capacity measures guided the design of an interview guide used to collect data from community informants, frontline health providers (FLP) and district health managers. Key qualitative themes were built into a questionnaire administered to households selected through systematic sampling approach. Findings showed that growing individualism, low trust in neighbours and apathetic behaviours undermined the capacity of mutual support for CHPS. The capacity to support CHPS was high for local leadership and community social mobilisation groups who often dedicated time to working with FLP to promote maternal and reproductive health service use, and in advocating broader support for CHPS. Within the wider community, commitment to voluntarism was low as members perceived CHPS to be owned by, and run on government funds and resources. Poor voluntarism was compounded by poverty that crippled the capacity to provide needed resource support for CHPS. Findings have great implications for building strong capable communities for participation in community oriented health programmes.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Participación de la Comunidad/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Creación de Capacidad/organización & administración , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Ghana , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Liderazgo , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud Rural , Movilidad Social , Apoyo Social , Confianza , Voluntarios/psicología
10.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0206809, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Decentralization is promoted as a strategy to improve health system performance by bringing decision-making closer to service delivery. Some studies have investigated if decentralization actually improves the health system. However, few have explored the conditions that enable it to be effective. To determine these conditions, we have analyzed the perspectives of decision-makers in the Philippines where devolution, one form of decentralization, was introduced 25 years ago. METHODS: Drawing from the "decision space" approach, we interviewed 27 decision-makers with an average of 23.6 years of working across different levels of the Philippine government health sector and representing various local settings. Qualitative analysis followed the "Framework Method." Conditions that either enable or hinder the effectiveness of decentralization were identified by exploring decision-making in five health sector functions. RESULTS: These conditions include: for planning, having a multi-stakeholder approach and monitoring implementation; for financing and budget allocation, capacities to raise revenues at local levels and pooling of funds at central level; for resource management, having a central level capable of augmenting resource needs at local levels and a good working relationship between the local health officer and the elected local official; for program implementation and service delivery, promoting innovation at local levels while maintaining fidelity to national objectives; and for monitoring and data management, a central level capable of ensuring that data collection from local levels is performed in a timely and accurate manner. CONCLUSIONS: The Philippine experience suggests that decentralization is a long and complex journey and not an automatic solution for enhancing service delivery. The role of the central decision-maker (e.g. Ministry of Health) remains important to assist local levels unable to perform their functions well. It is policy-relevant to analyze the conditions that make decentralization work and the optimal combination of decentralized and centralized functions that enhance the health system.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Programas de Gobierno/economía , Presupuestos , Toma de Decisiones , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Administración Financiera/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Filipinas , Política
11.
AIDS Behav ; 22(9): 3071-3082, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802550

RESUMEN

Since the discovery of the secondary preventive benefits of antiretroviral therapy, national and international governing bodies have called for countries to reach 90% diagnosis, ART engagement and viral suppression among people living with HIV/AIDS. The US HIV epidemic is dispersed primarily across large urban centers, each with different underlying epidemiological and structural features. We selected six US cities, including Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, and Seattle, with the objective of demonstrating the breadth of epidemiological and structural differences affecting the HIV/AIDS response across the US. We synthesized current and publicly-available surveillance, legal statutes, entitlement and discretionary funding, and service location data for each city. The vast differences we observed in each domain reinforce disparities in access to HIV treatment and prevention, and necessitate targeted, localized strategies to optimize the limited resources available for each city's HIV/AIDS response.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Creación de Capacidad/organización & administración , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Epidemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH , Recursos en Salud/organización & administración , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Creación de Capacidad/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Epidemias/economía , Epidemias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Gubernamental/organización & administración , Programas de Gobierno/economía , Programas de Gobierno/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas de Gobierno/organización & administración , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Política de Salud/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevención Secundaria/economía , Prevención Secundaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención Secundaria/organización & administración , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/economía , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
12.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 43(2): 229-269, 2018 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630707

RESUMEN

Do nonprofit hospitals provide enough community benefits to justify their tax exemptions? States have sought to enhance nonprofit hospitals' accountability and oversight through regulation, including requirements to report community benefits, conduct community health needs assessments, provide minimum levels of community benefits, and adhere to minimum income eligibility standards for charity care. However, little research has assessed these regulations' impact on community benefits. Using 2009-11 Internal Revenue Service data on community benefit spending for more than eighteen hundred hospitals and the Hilltop Institute's data on community benefit regulation, we investigated the relationship between these four types of regulation and the level and types of hospital-provided community benefits. Our multivariate regression analyses showed that only community health needs assessments were consistently associated with greater community benefit spending. The results for reporting and minimum spending requirements were mixed, while minimum income eligibility standards for charity care were unrelated to community benefit spending. State adoption of multiple types of regulation was consistently associated with higher levels of hospital-provided community benefits, possibly because regulatory intensity conveys a strong signal to the hospital community that more spending is expected. This study can inform efforts to design regulations that will encourage hospitals to provide community benefits consistent with policy makers' goals.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitales Filantrópicos/economía , Hospitales Filantrópicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Exención de Impuesto , Recolección de Datos , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Revelación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Revelación/estadística & datos numéricos , Regulación Gubernamental , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Necesidades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Evaluación de Necesidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Gobierno Estatal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
J Community Health ; 43(2): 372-377, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28988298

RESUMEN

Academic Medical Centers incur significant expenses associated with training residents and caring for underserved populations. No previous studies have analyzed hospital-level graduate medical education economics for pediatric residency training. Using data from the 2010-2011 academic year, we quantified total direct costs per year for training 12 community health track (CHT) residents. Utilizing sensitivity analyses, we estimated revenues generated by residents in inpatient and outpatient settings. The total yearly direct cost of training 12 CHT residents was $922,640 including salaries, benefits, and administrative costs. The estimated additional yearly inpatient net revenue from attending-resident clinical teams compared to attendingonly service was $109,452. For primary care clinics, the estimated yearly revenue differential of resident-preceptor teams was $455,940, compared to attending-only clinics. The replacement cost of 12 CHT residents with advanced practitioners was $457,596 per year.This study suggests there is positive return on a children's hospital's investment in a CHT.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Hospitales Pediátricos/economía , Internado y Residencia/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos
14.
J Community Psychol ; 45(6): 748-764, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28775389

RESUMEN

This paper describes a systematic approach to assessing community services post-Sandy Hook shooting. An evaluation team was invited to develop a sustainability plan for community services in Newtown. Service organizations, providers and families were interviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the range of services; respondent perspectives were coded using content analysis. We found that Newtown has a broad array of community services, but respondent groups varied in their perceptions of service adequacy. Consensus existed about core components of an ideal service system, including centralizing access; coordinating care; personalizing and tailoring services for families; and providing evidence-based care. The strategic community assessment approach developed here may inform how communities examine their service capacity and develop sustainability plans post-disaster.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Exposición a la Violencia , Violencia con Armas , Servicios de Salud Mental , Niño , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Connecticut , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Familia/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Medicina de Precisión/economía , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
15.
BMC Public Health ; 17(1): 224, 2017 02 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28241872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many low and middle income countries have developed community health strategies involving lay health workers, to complement and strengthen public health services. This study explores variations in costing parameters pertinent to deployment of community health volunteers across different contexts outlining considerations for costing program scale-up. METHODS: The study used quasi experimental study design and employed both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore community health unit implementation activities and costs and compare costs across purposively selected sites that differed socially, economically and ecologically. Data were collected from November 2010 to December 2013 through key informant interviews and focus group discussions. We interviewed 16 key informants (eight District community health strategy focal persons, eight frontline field officers), and eight focus group discussions (four with community health volunteers and four with community health committee) and 560 sets of monthly cost data. Cost data were tabulated using Microsoft Excel. Qualitative data were transcribed and coded using a content analysis framework. RESULTS: Four critical elements: attrition rates for community health volunteers, geography and population density, livelihood opportunity costs and benefits, and social opportunity benefits, drove cost variations across the three sites. Attrition rate was highest in peri-urban site where population is highly mobile and lowest in nomadic site. More households were covered by community health workers in the peri-urban area making per capita costs considerably less than in the nomadic settings where long distances had to be covered to reach sparsely distributed households. Livelihood opportunity costs for Community Health Volunteers were highest in nomadic setting, while peri-urban ones reported substantial employability benefits resulting from training. Social opportunity benefits were highest in rural site. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that costs of implementing community health strategy varied due to different area contextual factors in Kenya. This study identified four critical elements that drive cost variations: attrition rates for community health volunteers, geography and population density, livelihood opportunity costs and benefits, and social opportunity benefits. Health programme managers and policy-makers need to pay attention to details of contextual factors in costing for effective implementation of community health strategies.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Adulto , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/educación , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Kenia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud Pública/economía
17.
Soc Sci Med ; 146: 182-90, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26517295

RESUMEN

Budget experiments can provide additional guidance to health system reform requiring the identification of a subset of programs and services that accrue the highest social value to 'communities'. Such experiments simulate a realistic budget resource allocation assessment among competitive programs, and position citizens as decision makers responsible for making 'collective sacrifices'. This paper explores the use of a participatory budget experiment (with 88 participants clustered in social groups) to model public health care reform, drawing from a set of realistic scenarios for potential health care users. We measure preferences by employing a contingent ranking alongside a budget allocation exercise (termed 'willingness to assign') before and after program cost information is revealed. Evidence suggests that the budget experiment method tested is cognitively feasible and incentive compatible. The main downside is the existence of ex-ante "cost estimation" bias. Additionally, we find that participants appeared to underestimate the net social gain of redistributive programs. Relative social value estimates can serve as a guide to aid priority setting at a health system level.


Asunto(s)
Presupuestos , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Prioridades en Salud/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Participación de la Comunidad , Toma de Decisiones , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Asignación de Recursos , España
18.
Rural Remote Health ; 15(3): 2942, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26195023

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to identify the key enablers of change in re-orienting a remote acute care model to comprehensive primary healthcare delivery. The setting of the study was a 12-bed hospital in Fitzroy Crossing, Western Australia. METHODS: Individual key informant, in-depth interviews were completed with five of six identified senior leaders involved in the development of the Fitzroy Valley Health Partnership. Interviews were recorded and transcripts were thematically analysed by two investigators for shared views about the enabling factors strengthening primary healthcare delivery in a remote region of Australia. RESULTS: Participants described theestablishment of a culturally relevant primary healthcare service, using a community-driven, 'bottom up' approach characterised by extensive community participation. The formal partnership across the government and community controlled health services was essential, both to enable change to occur and to provide sustainability in the longer term. A hierarchy of major themes emerged. These included community participation, community readiness and desire for self-determination; linkages in the form of a government community controlled health service partnership; leadership; adequate infrastructure; enhanced workforce supply; supportive policy; and primary healthcare funding. CONCLUSIONS: The strong united leadership shown by the community and the health service enabled barriers to be overcome and it maximised the opportunities provided by government policy changes. The concurrent alignment around a common vision enabled implementation of change. The key principle learnt from this study is the importance of community and health service relationships and local leadership around a shared vision for the re-orientation of community health services.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Modelos Organizacionales , Atención Primaria de Salud , Servicios de Salud Rural , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Participación de la Comunidad , Atención Integral de Salud , Atención a la Salud , Consejo Directivo , Programas de Gobierno , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Hospitales con menos de 100 Camas , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Liderazgo , Innovación Organizacional , Investigación Cualitativa , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Australia Occidental , Recursos Humanos
19.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 33(6): 1058-66, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24889956

RESUMEN

In the past decade, "big push" global health initiatives financed by international donors have aimed to rapidly reach ambitious health targets in low-income countries. The health system impacts of these efforts are infrequently assessed. Saving Mothers, Giving Life is a global public-private partnership that aims to reduce maternal mortality dramatically in one year in eight districts in Uganda and Zambia. We evaluated the first six to twelve months of the program's implementation, its ownership by national ministries of health, and its effects on health systems. The project's impact on maternal mortality is not reported here. We found that the Saving Mothers, Giving Life initiative delivered a large "dose" of intervention quickly by capitalizing on existing US international health assistance platforms, such as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. Early benefits to the broader health system included greater policy attention to maternal and child health, new health care infrastructure, and new models for collaborating with the private sector and communities. However, the rapid pace, external design, and lack of a long-term financing plan hindered integration into the health system and local ownership. Sustaining and scaling up early gains of similar big push initiatives requires longer-term commitments and a clear plan for transition to national control.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/tendencias , Países en Desarrollo , Planes de Sistemas de Salud/organización & administración , Planes de Sistemas de Salud/tendencias , Mortalidad Materna/etnología , Mortalidad Materna/tendencias , Pobreza/etnología , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/tendencias , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Femenino , Predicción , Salud Global , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pobreza/economía , Embarazo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Uganda , Zambia
20.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 25(1 Suppl): 139-50, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24583493

RESUMEN

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S and a source of large racial and ethnic disparities in population health. Policy development is a powerful but sometimes overlooked public health tool for reducing cancer burden and disparities. Along with other partners in the public health system, community-based organizations such as local cancer councils can play valuable roles in developing policies that are responsive to community needs and in mobilizing resources to support policy adoption and implementation. This paper examines the current and potential roles played by local cancer councils to reduce cancer burden and disparities. Responsive public health systems require vehicles for communities to engage in policy development. Cancer councils provide promising models of engagement. Untapped opportunities exist for enhancing policy development through cancer councils, such as expanding targets of engagement to include private-sector stakeholders and expanding methods of engagement utilizing the Affordable Care Act's Prevention and Public Health Fund.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Consejos de Planificación en Salud , Política de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Arkansas , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/economía , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Consejos de Planificación en Salud/economía , Consejos de Planificación en Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...